Black Lives Matter, the ND Pipeline and the anti-Trump protests: same old, same old

I’m astonished that no-one has yet pointed out, publicly and loudly, that the organized anti-Trump protests following his victory in last Tuesday’s election are as organized, and as manipulative, as most of the other protests we’ve seen all year long.  It’s the same professional agitators, going from issue to issue and from state to state, seizing on any popular idea and transforming it into a lever to undermine our nation, our democracy and our constitution.

Consider:

  • The Black Lives Matter protests were very clearly organized.  Numerous police forces admitted or asserted that ‘outsiders‘ came into town to make trouble, then moved on to the next protest.  They were funded by the same source that bankrolled the Ferguson riots ‘protests’.
  • As soon as the North Dakota pipeline protests geared up a few months ago, what happened to the BLM protests?  Suddenly there was hardly a mention of them.  The reason was simple – the activists turning the pipeline protests into a violent anti-police, anti-The-Man free-for-all were often the same ones that had been behind the BLM nastiness.
  • Now that President-elect Trump is the focus, what’s happened to the pipeline protests?  All of a sudden we don’t hear Word One about them in the media . . . because those organizing them, and spearheading the violence there, are now organizing the protests and spearheading the violence in the anti-Trump protests.

I’d love to be able to examine arrest records, or attendance records, from police forces all over the country, to see how many names and how many faces cropped up at all of the above protests over the past year.  I’m willing to bet money there’ll be a lot of overlap.

One hopes Mr. Trump will find a way to cut the Gordian knot that ties all these anti-constitutional, anti-democratic, anti-American organizations and individuals together.  It’s long overdue . . . and entirely necessary, IMHO.

Peter

12 comments

  1. Y'know, modern facial recognition software is pretty good. If decent resolution footage is available of the rioters…er, "protesters", it should be easy enough to build an image database of individuals at each scene and then compare them to the other scenes.

    Facebook has a fairly good facial recognition system. I wonder if it's available through their API. Hey, they can't be all evil all the time…

  2. I had a related thought: Trump says he will start by deporting criminal illegals. There are signs suggesting that deportations may not go much beyond that. In light of this, it would be funny if some of them are deported only because of crimes they commit during these anti-Trump protests.

    While funny and deserved, the organizers should also be held accountable. But I truly don't think they care about consequences.

  3. George Soros is uaually cited as the money man and mastermind behind it all. The antisemites claim that he is destroying western societies for the benefit of Israel, but in fact he is doing just as much damage there, too, and they hate him for it.

    What I can't seem to figure out is his motivation. He won't live to see the payoff from his strategies even if they succeed, so why is he doing this.

    We know that Jack Dorsey's Twitter got a billion dollars plus investment from a Saudi prince, which sort of explains why Twitter goes after critics of Islam. Don't know about Facebook and Zuckerberg, might be similar.

    Who are Soros' clients, who has a gazillion of dollars (petrodollars?) in spare cash to invest in Soros' hedge funds? Is he a tool of the Saudis? He may have been, but why still keep doing it at his age, mere footsteps away from death's door?

  4. Who is it that hires Professional Protestors to subvert American law(s)? Enemies of America; could it be? Surely not those outdated Communists? Perhaps, though, it's those whose sole profit is Money through Tyranny. What should we do with them? Are stocks in the town square sufficient? Should we adapt Islamic punishments to use their tactics against them? Or the French one of "a cigarette and a bullet"? After all, the American way of "free housing, meals, and medical care" seems almost like a reward . . .

  5. Anonymous, sometimes I wonder if Soros hates Western Civ in general because of what happened when he was young, and he wants to see it torn down and [insert utopia here] in its place, no more and no less. But that's pure speculation on my part.

    LittleRed1

  6. Soros has no love for Jews. He made his financial start by stealing from his fellow Jews, under the auspices of the NAZI's, during ww2. I'm really surprised the Mossad hasn't taken him out. He seems to act against Israel, but not directly. Perhaps that is why. Foolish on their part, I think.

  7. the moment you can tie several people to several violent events, you have the basis for R.I.C.C.O. charges…and that would probably put an end to the organization….so what is the justice department waiting for??? oh yea…they are waiting for trump to be inaugurated and the limits obumbles has them under lifted so they can do their job

  8. Any competent law enforcement would be doing Intel analysis on the crowds to find leaders and tracking them back to their hq. Until january, our law enforcement is providing the protestor top cover.

  9. Hmmm, you know …

    I wonder what would happen if someone used some open-source image processing software on some of the crowd photographs from the various protests… Would be interesting to see if there there is any "high incidence of correlation" with the facial images.

    Just sayin' of course….

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *