Forced global world government under the guise of health care


Last month I warned that the World Health Organization (WHO) was mounting a power grab that might give it the authority to override national governments and dictate state policies – up to and including controlling our everyday activities.  The two articles I wrote were:

If you didn’t read them at the time, I urge you to do so now.

Neil Oliver of GB News sums up the frightening prospect of next week’s WHO meeting.  He calls it “the single, greatest global power grab that any of us has seen in our lifetime.

Once … ink is dry on the necessary paperwork, we and most of the rest of the billions living on planet earth will, in the event of another pandemic, take our instructions not from politicians we actually voted for – and could, hypothetically at least, have the option of getting rid of – but from the unelected, faceless, bureaucrats of the WHO.

This is no conspiracy theory, by the way. No tin hats required. This is real, and happening now. And a whole lot of people would rather you weren’t paying attention.

The WHO is a fabulously wealthy offshoot of the United Nations. It has its head office in Geneva and is presently headed by Ethiopian-born Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Know much about him?

No, nor me. He and it are funded by 194 member states and also by donations from private entities. As things stand, most of its money comes from the United States, from Communist China and from computer salesman and international man of mystery Bill Gates.

Let us remember that for the past two years, the WHO has loudly celebrated the approach taken by China to the handling of Covid-19.

. . .

Now we in Great Britain – without so much as a by your leave from our leaders – and along with around 95 per cent of the world’s population – must contemplate a future in which decisions about what we will be ordered – ordered – to do in the face of another pandemic will be taken by the unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats of the Chinese Communist Party-worshipping WHO, under the unseemly influence of a tech billionaire with no more qualifications in the fields of medicine and disease control than I have.

It is worth remembering that President Donald Trump insisted on divorce from the WHO – on the grounds that it was too close to China, only for President Biden to remarry them again in 2021. All of that is history, however. In a matter of days, the World Health Assembly will meet in Geneva for a vote on the treaty. The target date for final ratification is in May 2024, but by then the power grab will have long been completed.

There’s more at the link.  It’s well worth reading in full:  or, if you prefer, you can watch his talk on YouTube.

Mark Crispin Miller sums up the latest developments and their implications.

  • The World Health Organization has started drafting a global pandemic treaty on pandemic preparedness that would grant it absolute power over global biosecurity, such as the power to implement digital identities/vaccine passports, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions, standardized medical care and more.
  • The WHO is not qualified to make global health decisions. As just one example, the WHO didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021, yet scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being declared. The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne transmission.
  • More importantly, a one-size-fits-all approach to pandemic response simply does not work, because pandemic threats are not identical in all parts of the world. Even people in the same region do not have identical risk and may not need or benefit from identical treatment.
  • The WHO will accept two more days of public comment on the treaty, June 16 and 17, 2022, so prepare your statements now. The World Health Assembly will also vote on amendments to the International Health Regulations, May 22-28, 2022, which may also strip away more individual rights and liberties.

Again, more at the link.

Folks, this is a deadly serious threat to our liberty.  That’s no exaggeration.  Health care is being used as the thin edge of the wedge, the camel’s nose, to chip away at our democratic rights and freedoms and reduce us to serfdom.  Don’t believe me?  Go read the draft regulations and draft treaty for yourself.  They’re not hard to understand.

If you haven’t already done so, by all means contact your elected representatives and protest about this.  Sadly, it probably won’t do much good.  Both the Democratic and Republican parties are part of the “Uniparty”, and I daresay both will vote to approve the new treaty once it’s finalized, because they identify more with the globalists than they do with us, their electorate.

Nevertheless, let’s begin preparations now to resist implementation of these globalist wet dreams.  Local governments, and state governments, are best placed to run interference for us.  Let’s make sure we have the best we can elect, and make sure they understand that when it comes down to a choice between rights and freedoms, and totalitarian one-size-fits-all prescriptions, we expect them to choose the former.

Let’s also be fully aware of the implications of these regulations and the proposed treaty for our future, and fight them for all we’re worth.  Winston Churchill said it best.

If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may be even a worse fate, you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.

He also advised:

Never give in – never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense.

Good advice on both counts.



  1. While fighting to prevent WHO from taking over, don't forget that they really do want to kill us. As you build your food supplies, don't forget to acquire a good store of medicines and medical supplies.

  2. Any such treaty (just like UN gun control attempts), even if Congress ratifies it and the president signs it, is prima facie unconstitutional and moot right out of the gate.

    As countless bureaucrats shot in the face would find out on Day One of trying to enforce any such nonsense.

    Next problem.

    1. I agree that passing it is one thing, enforcing it is another.
      Look at how many local jurisdictions ignored cvd regulations over the past 2 years.
      Look at how many local governments have publicly said they won't cooperate with federal and state governments on warrants, seizures, etc.

  3. @Aesop: I'm afraid you're over-optimistic about the level of resistance in the US population. Sure, there'd be some who do as you said: but I suspect they'll be relatively few. There are too many sheep in the mix, and not enough sheepdogs.

    As for being unconstitutional . . . how many of our current laws, rules and regulations are prima facie unconstitutional, yet our legal system still enforces them as if they were legitimate?

  4. The GB article is authored by Neil Oliver, not Jamie Oliver (why would a UK chef be commenting on UN's WHO?).

  5. I think Aesop isn't that far off. Seeing a bunch of foreigners in blue helmets trying to boss Americans around is a whole different ballgame than anything we've seen before. It might just be the straw that breaks the camel's back. Or to put it another way, hunting season might just open and there will be no bag limit. What foreign troop in their right mind would want to deploy into the US?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *