The anti-meat propaganda war is dialing up


We’ve discussed on several occasions how the World Economic Forum’s “Build Back Better” initiative includes discouraging the use of meat, instead encouraging us to eat insects and their byproducts.  It’s noteworthy that many W.E.F. advocates (take a bow, Bill Gates) are investing in insect processing plants to produce such food . . . and in farmland, where they can grow something rather tastier for themselves and their “woke” cronies.

As part of that effort, we’re seeing anti-meat and pro-insect propaganda articles and programming spreading throughout the news media and social media.  Here’s an example from the BBC yesterday.

The air in my family home in Uganda was filled with a distinct aroma, not dissimilar to the smell of beef being grilled. It was December 2000 and my sister, Maggie, was frying grasshoppers. The more she stirred the green, crispy locust-like insects, the stronger and richer the aroma became. As they sizzled and steam rose from the pan, my taste buds tingled – I couldn’t wait to eat this delicious snack.

This wasn’t my first experience of eating grasshoppers – I used to eat them regularly during my childhood. In Uganda, grasshoppers are a nutritious delicacy and a much sought-after snack.

. . .

Some 22 years later, in June this year, I was feeling nostalgic for this taste of home, so I decided to recreate some of my favourite grasshopper snacks. It gave me the idea for an experiment – could I swap all the meat in my diet for these crunchy critters? I had heard about the sustainability benefits of eating insects and was intrigued to find out how much I could lower my carbon footprint if I introduced grasshoppers as my main source of protein.

. . .

The beauty of grasshoppers is that you can eat them with many types of food in the same way you would eat chicken wings with French fries. Over the four days of my experiment, I ate grasshoppers with cassava, potatoes, rice and cowpeas stew.

A cup of grasshoppers is slightly more expensive than a kilogram (2.2lbs) of beef, which goes for around 13,000USh (£2.86/$3.42). However, with only one cup of grasshoppers, I made three meals.

On the second day, I had grasshoppers and potatoes, which I normally eat with meat or bean stew. On the third and fourth day, I paired the grasshoppers with rice and cowpeas stew.  

I might have reduced the carbon emissions from my diet by a factor of ten by substituting beef for grasshoppers as my main source of protein.

To me, grasshoppers are like popcorn – a snack that I never want to stop eating and don’t get bored of. While I personally find beef starts to taste bland if I eat it too often, my appetite for grasshoppers didn’t wane, even after eating it four days in a row.

There’s more at the link, if you can stomach it (you should pardon the expression).

It’s all propaganda, of course.  I know that, because I’ve been to Uganda (and many other African nations) many times.  I am an African, dammit!  I was born and bred there.  The fact that I’m also Caucasian (in other words – gasp! shock! horror! – white) is irrelevant.  I know what Africans eat in most parts of that continent, and what they like – certainly better than almost all outsiders.

  • Sure, Africans eat grasshoppers – mostly because the grasshoppers have eaten their crops, and they’ve got to eat something or starve to death.  I’ve eaten grasshoppers myself on occasion.  They were just another food-from-necessity, certainly not food-because-I-love-their-flavor.  (Don’t eat the hind legs.  They’re barbed.  They bite back.)
  • Yes, vegetables and side dishes can be eaten with grasshoppers – just as they can with any other main course.  Try them with meat or fish or chicken, too.  What’s your point?
  • Every single time I’ve offered a Ugandan, or Kenyan, or Chadian, or [insert African country name here] a meal with meat or fish or poultry, instead of grasshoppers, they’ve been all over it like white on rice (you should pardon that expression, too).  In general, they don’t eat grasshoppers because it’s a preferred food:  they eat them because they can’t afford anything better.  As soon as they can afford something better, they’ll eat that for preference.  (Try walking in on an average African bush peasant family who are busily eating grasshoppers, and hold up a can of Chef Boyardee.  If you’re lucky, you’ll survive the frenzied scramble to be the first to snatch it out of your hand.  If you’re very lucky, you might even survive without permanent injury, disfigurement or disability.)
  • You don’t see any commercially processed, canned or frozen grasshoppers on African supermarket shelves, do you?  That might be what detectives call “a clue”.  If it was in high demand, businesses would find a way to make money out of it.  They don’t, because they can’t.  Q.E.D.

All this bushwa enthusiasm over grasshoppers as a meat replacement is so much hogwash.  Every word rings false.  This article is so over-the-top tra-la-la about “lowering my carbon footprint” and “sustainability benefits” that it’s laughable.  No normal person, particularly in Africa, bothers to use such expressions in daily conversation.  This is nothing more than heavily emphasized and recycled left-wing progressive talking points.  It’s propaganda to the max.  It’s “beat readers over the head with political correctness until they’re so punch-drunk they’re anesthetized to the facts”.  It’s verbal effluent.

When you read such articles, remember to ask yourself, “Would locals really talk like that?  Would the average African, or South American, or South-East Asian, really blather on about their carbon footprint and meat alternatives and eating insects like they were absolutely fascinated by the subject?”  Of course they wouldn’t!  When someone tries to imply that they do, you’ll know where they’re coming from.


P.S.:  This morning my wife and I are driving to a town about an hour away, where we’ll be placing an order with a meat processor for an entire cow.  We’re buying it to divide among four households.  That’s about 800 pounds (hanging weight) of freshly slaughtered beef – and if I find a single grasshopper in or near it, I’ll demand a replacement cow, plus compensation!


  1. There's a pretty easy way to combat this: Show up to speeches and debates on this topic with a nice little container full of accredited insect snacks, hop up on the stage, and offer samples. They'll say 'no', which is a cue to start taking photographic evidence – and if they say 'yes', take a picture and print that.

  2. That would assume you could actually CATCH enough grasshoppers to make a 'meal'… And no, they are not filling. Just sayin…

  3. We here in America also used to eat grasshoppers and some bug larvae, along with horse, rat, mice, little song birds, lizzards, limpets, snails and just about anything else that has protein in it.

    So why did we all switch, for the most part, to the 'traditional' food proteins? Because the regular proteins that you can buy from your local store are tastier, easier to get and overall cheap to produce.

    But we ate all those 'non-traditional' proteins because we had to. Grasshoppers and larvae because we picked them off of our food crops (or they were in our not-well-stored food.) Horses were eaten regularly until after WWII, and are still eaten in some areas (but horsed are cuuuute so we shouldn't eat them, right? How about harvesting a good portion of the wild horses that are out in the West and use them for people or animal feed? Out west, wild horses are just deer without antlers for the damage they do to food crops and range land.)

    And back in the 70's, 80's, 90's, 00's, 10's… the concept of ranching worms or other bug proteins came up. Sure, more full of proteins than 'meat' but pound-for-pound far costlier even custom-raised beef.


    Now there are lots of proteins that are easily harvested, wild, tasty (for values of tasty) and are invasive species. Iguana, snakes, feral hogs, feral horses and cattle, pheasants, those jumping carp (which taste better than tilapia supposedly, but I don't eat tilapia as they are poo eaters) and more and more. Harvest those first please.

  4. This is joke being pulled on us by the globalists to see how gullible we can be. As already mentioned insect protein is not as tasty and is much more expensive, especially to raise in quantity.

    Nothing simpler than a cow and 3 acres of grass. Our current farming methods (currently a necessity as we have made our bed) are slowly eroding our topsoil. If we switched to a more dispersed method called regenerative ranching we would have eat more meat and eggs (including beef, sheep, goat, pig and chicken) and our topsoil would recover. Not quite this simple, but we would need 10's of Thousands of small farmers managing the process (We are currently at the point where big agra is running the show) as the process requires active management to balance the animals in accordance with the weather. This is also referred to as grass farming.

    50% of green space in the US is grass not used for grazing. Imagine if an HOA had a sheep herd and they grazed your yard 1 day ever 3 weeks. The Greenies who love nature would actually have to look out for what they are stepping in, or they will really commune with nature.

    I'll take my pasture, cows and dirty boots over grasshoppers any day. Feel free to make your own choice.

  5. As an aside, I've noticed a bit of a paradox: it's Leftists pushing the "eat the bugs and like it" line. The majority of vegans are Leftists.

    Is anyone aware of how the "plant-based food" camp feels about the prospect of eating grasshoppers and worms? After all, they are among the living creatures vegans refuse to eat.

    Or are vegans just a bunch of hypocrites who think eating living creatures is bad only if they're cute?

  6. Not into the John the Baptist diet, thank you. Locusts, aka grasshoppers, should be eaten by the chickens, ducks, and turkeys. Not directly by me. I prefer an intermediate step in the food chain.

  7. Would there be a difference in the taste between "grasshoppers" and "what we are told are grasshoppers and guessed them to taste like" stuff? I wouldn't put it past them.

  8. Hey Peter;

    The truth is that they want "You and me to eat the Bugs" they will of course eat the beef and fish"….it is a class distinction.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *