Here are just a recent few of the literally hundreds of headlines and reports coming in from all over the United States concerning electoral fraud. Those who deny it happened are going to have a very, very hard time explaining them away. These aren’t allegations or speculation – they’re already-proven facts, based on official records, and are not in dispute. Some may, of course, be explained by other factors; but we don’t yet know that.
- Analysis Finds Over 10,000 Dead People Returned Mail-In Ballots in Michigan. “About 9,500 voters confirmed dead through the Social Security Death Index (SSDI) are marked in the state’s mail voting database as having returned ballots. Another nearly 2,000 are 100 years old or more and aren’t listed as known living centenarians.”
- Tens of Thousands of Pennsylvania Ballots Were Returned Before They Were Sent Out. “Over 51,000 ballots were marked as returned just a day after they were sent out—an extraordinary speed, given U.S. Postal Service (USPS) delivery times, while nearly 35,000 were returned on the same day they were mailed out. Another more than 23,000 have a return date earlier than the sent date. More than 9,000 have no sent date.”
- Yes, Wisconsin Elections Commission Gave Unlawful Advice to Alter Ballots. “In other words, the Wisconsin Elections Commission has instructed clerks to break state law for two presidential elections, two U.S. Senate elections, two State Supreme Court elections, and one gubernatorial election in the past four years. That shouldn’t inspire any confidence in the manner in which the WEC has been administering elections in this state.”
- Former Nevada AG Claims Signature Verification Setting In State Was Manually Lowered to 40%. The link is to a five-minute news interview in which he provides details. It’s been officially confirmed, in court, that the 40% setting was used. Experts state that’s not a trustworthy procedure. At least 200,000 votes may be affected – far more than the winning margin in that state.
- Georgia begins statewide hand recount of all election votes. “With the margin being so close, it will require a full, by-hand recount in each county,” Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger told reporters in Atlanta. “This will help build confidence. It will be an audit, a recount and a re-canvass all at once.”
Tucker Carlson investigated electoral fraud in last week’s elections, and provides damning evidence of how widespread it was. I urge you to read or watch his report in full. It’s eye-opening, and gives the lie to all those who insist that no fraud took place. (Note that I twice tried to put up embedded video of his report, and both times it was removed from YouTube. Draw your own conclusions. I eventually used the link above, to a text version of his comments on the Fox News Web site.)
The five states mentioned in the news reports cited above account for 68 electoral college votes. President Trump is presumed to win the as-yet-undeclared vote in North Carolina, where he leads the polls, which would give him an electoral college vote count of 232. If so, he needs only 38 more votes to reach the winning margin of 270 votes – 56% of those in question, with a few more possibly to be challenged in other states. Joe Biden, on the other hand, is declared by the press to have plus-or-minus 290 electoral college votes at present (depending on who’s counting). He can only afford to lose 20 of those votes before dropping below the 270 threshold.
If neither candidate gets to the 270 threshold, then the result of the election will fall to either slates of electors certified by each state’s legislature, or to a Congressional vote where each state delegation gets one vote. I suspect neither option will be attractive to those who’ve already staked out extreme positions on one side or another. (We discussed all this last weekend.)
I imagine that if it comes down to either of those options, there will be massive unrest and rejection throughout the country, whoever wins. Let’s pray it doesn’t come to that. Our best hope at present is that the courts weigh in definitively on whether or not there has, indeed, been electoral fraud at work. Their voice will probably be given greater weight than that of politicians.
Peter
Peter,
As for the deniers.
"The bee can show the flies the flower, but they prefer the shit."
We have hard data evidence of multiple election issues locally. Lawsuits are being filed.
The fact that multiple parties won't even look at the data or refuse to acknowledge tricky speaks more to their lack of morals and ethics than anything else.
In sports terms:
Doubling the number of players on one side in the second half of the game may ensure victory for that side, but it destroys the game.
If elections aren't above board, then they are useless and illegitimate. Stealing the most important election in the world is treason and will lead to large conflict.
A joke from Lyndon Johnson’s first win of his Texas Senate seat.
A man asks a little boy, "why is the boy crying?"
The boy answers "my Dad does not love me."
"But, Jose, your Dad has is dead."
And the boy answers, "yes, but he came back to vote for Lyndon Johnson and did not come to visit me and my mom!"
https://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2020/11/recount-demand-write-snail-mail-to.html
Nice idea there if we can gt enough folks to do it
The video link has been disabled.
The hand-ballot recount audit in Georgia: I've read that this was an already-planned event that was assigned to the Presidential election only – in other words, no down-ballot votes will be audited, only the Presidential ones. This is a little unfortunate, if true, because including the Senate ballots might eliminate the need for a runoff election.
Stealing the most important election in the world is treason and will lead to large conflict.
Which outcome was, I gathered, rather the entire point of the Left doing it.
The solution isn't to clutch our pearls, but rather to give them precisely that existential life-and-death struggle, in spades, and end the problem for at least a generation, if not far longer.
America with 200M people instead of 330M isn't all bad, and would be vastly preferable to one with the morons in charge, unrestrained by anything like reason or the rule of law.
If they really want Rule 308, it's high time they got what they wanted, and in haste.
I'll settle for a favorable and correct series of court decisions for now, but like the series of compromises in the US Congress in the early 1800s, that merely postpones the central question necessitating the underlying looming civil war, until technology and the resultant conflict becomes even more toxic and lethal.
Let's lance this boil now, so we don't have to do amputations later on. It's absolutely going to happen anyway, and the only open question is how soon.
I'd rather take it on while we have the strength to prevail, and the will to do so. The recidivism of the other side is beyond argument, and only holding their heads under water until they stop kicking is going to cure them of the habit, at this point. The desire for totalitarianism is like rabies. The only cure is a bullet to the head. Time to start medicating.
The Wisconsin case you highlight is a result of a VERY aggressive 'read' of the law by Don O'Donnell. The primary text does NOT require the voter to 'cure' the defect in witness-address. There is a secondary statute which mentions the voter, but not in terms which are definitive.
The far better case for fraud is the problem of 240,000 ballots mailed out to people who may no longer be residents, or may no longer be alive–or whose addresses changed so that the "mail-to" address used by the State is occupied by someone else.
I am well aware that the State's Election Commission is populated by Lefty- to FAR-Lefty creatures and they are willing to shave as much as possible in a Left direction. But O'Donnell's case is very weak tea.
Larry Correia again, with another very good question:
I noticed yesterday that I was having lots of strangers show up to scream at me whenever I posted any information about election fraud, but they were all low information types just barfing up “fact checks” which was basically whatever the news had just told them, but none of them had the basic knowledge of how fraud works to even sorta discuss any of the actual data. So I got curious and posted the following on facebook:
One quick question, only answer if you have worked in auditing/stats/fraud/investigations/or other data analysis type fields. In your entire career, have you ever seen a case that threw up this many flags that DID NOT turn out to be fraud?
https://monsterhunternation.com/2020/11/12/i-asked-one-simple-question-to-people-who-work-with-fraud/
Election Fraud Denier.
Sounds like an appropriate name for them!