What will life be like without police? Ask Mexico. Ask Africa.

The Federalist points out that all those demanding the “defunding” or abolition of police forces might do well to consider the consequences, which are clearly visible in Mexico.

But let’s say these ultra-progressive municipal governments could get their wish and abolish the police in their cities entirely. What would happen? Inevitably, an armed group would emerge and impose a monopoly on the use of force.

If you want an idea of how that works, look to our southern neighbor, Mexico, where over the past decade endemically corrupt police departments in some areas have been supplanted by autodefensas, or local self-defense militias. But before you get too excited about the prospect of paramilitary autodefensas policing American cities, understand that in Mexico these groups are a mixed bag at best—and at worst they’re not much better than the corrupt local police and cartel gunmen they replaced. More importantly, their mere presence in Mexico was and is a disturbing sign of societal decay.

To understand why, a bit of background is needed. The modern autodefensas movement in Mexico arose during some of the most violent years of Mexico’s ongoing drug war. In 2013, a doctor from the cartel-ravaged state of Michoacán, José Manuel Mireles Valverde, organized one of the first self-defense militias to fight against the Knights Templar Cartel. He initially recruited ordinary men, shop keepers and farmers, to hunt down cartel henchmen and drive them out of their towns.

Initially, these ad-hoc militias met with some success, capturing or killing members of the Knights Templar, setting up roadblocks and ambushes, and expanding the number of militias operating throughout Michoacán. But as the violence in the region increased, the militias eventually caught the attention of the Mexican government, which deployed the military against both cartels and autodefensas … By then, the line between autodefensas and cartels had begun to blur. The militias had been infiltrated by cartel members, including former members of the Knights Templar who knew the cartel was losing power.

. . .

… the autodefensas movement quickly went from being an organic uprising against a vicious cartel to a vigilante free-for-all … As the government stepped in to control the autodefensas movement, it became increasingly clear that cartel members were joining self-defense militias, especially in Michoacán and neighboring Guerrero state. Sometimes it worked in the opposite direction. Lacking resources and weapons, self-defense militias would turn to drug cartels for financing, and would later be used by drug lords as proxy forces against their rivals.

Today, autodefensas remain active in parts of Mexico but they have largely melded into the ever-shifting patchwork of gangs, cartel off-shoots, and corrupt local police forces vying for power and territory. The fragmenting of Mexico’s criminal gangs and armed groups has helped fuel rising violence in recent years, with this year on track to break last year’s record for homicides. As far as violence and corruption go, things are worse in Mexico now than they were when Mireles formed the first autodefensa group.

That is to say, the rise of self-defense militias in Mexico, no less than the rise of cartels, is a direct result of the collapse of civil authority. Absent a functioning state, militias are no more accountable to the general public than a drug cartel—and no more capable of resisting corruption than the local or federal police.

There’s more at the link.

That was pretty much my experience in large parts of sub-Saharan Africa, too.  As the authority of the state and/or local government waned during periods of anarchy and civil unrest, local gangs, tribes or other groups would take advantage of the “power vacuum” to seize control of their own areas.  They would levy “taxes” against the people to fund their operations (in reality, organized looting on an ongoing basis), and terrorize anyone who refused to pay, up to and including rape, torture and killing.  If the “ordinary people” organized to oppose them, the opposing force would rapidly become corrupted by precisely the same temptations that had attracted their oppressors.  Once entrenched, such local power players could only be dislodged by superior force – never by reasoning with them.  They were making too much money (by local standards) to be willing to give it up, and nobody else in that impoverished continent had enough money to offer them a bribe big enough to stop.

Another part of that problem was that many merchants and other vendors simply refused to deliver supplies to the region(s) concerned.  They became food deserts, with the only exception being foreign aid (mostly stolen by the groups in control, and sold in local markets) or subsistence agriculture.  I can tell you right now, if BLM or other groups take over local city suburbs, the big stores in and near them will simply close their doors, rather than be robbed on a daily basis.  That will lead to the activists (a.k.a. thugs and looters) trying to extend their activities into areas still well supplied, which will in turn provoke a violent reaction from those in the latter areas, trying to protect what they’ve got.  Since “the best form of defense is attack”, to quote a well-known saying, they’ll probably take the fight to the activists in their own areas, too.  In the absence of effective policing, who’s going to stop either side?

That’s your recipe for at least a localized civil war, right there.  Don’t tell me it won’t happen.  It will.  I’ve seen it before, far too many times for comfort.  It’ll happen here, too, if we create conditions favorable for it.



  1. Disruption, confusion & chaos are opportunities for many. Warlords, gangs & cartels do grow out these things.
    We in the US might think we're immune to this but history says it can happen anywhere.

  2. Peter,

    Plan B could be stupidity on the left causing a vacuum the radical
    right takes advantage of as official government thugs. Not that
    different than cartel but legitimacy. Some would be happy many
    would not.

    Either way there will be pushing in the isles and likely a bit
    of gun play with negative end result.


  3. Exactly what Old NFO said. This is what the moneyed Left want. And no, they have not thought through the consequences of this. A strong middle class keeps them safe. It gives something for the poor/destitute to aspire to or hope for, without it there is nothing to loose.

  4. That's exactly what happens.

    It's also what the anarcho-communist Left wants to happen.

    Because it self-legitimizes the need for a dictatorial Commie power grab, to "clean up society". Since ever, the whole thing is a Left-wing con job, exactly like advertising.

    Create the need for the otherwise needless; then meet the new "need".
    They've just taken ads for dishsoap and popcorn makers to their logical political extreme.

    It's a riff on the Mafia's "protection" racket:
    "That's a nice society you have there; be a real shame is it suddenly burned down."

    The only answer to that is to shoot the salesmen; and then hunt down and exterminate the guy who sent the salesmen, and all their minions, to the last man, and last child.

    Nothing less will suffice.

    The Left, whether they realize it or not, is setting the table for an existential war of survival, down to the last side standing.

    It's a recipe for civil war on a biblical Armageddon scale.
    Everyone's families and entire lifestyle are the chips in that game.

    Kill all they send.
    Then find and destroy the nest.
    First one to go ugliest the fastest wins.

    Any half measures are a recipe for self-destruction.
    Dresden and Hiroshima were a template.
    Second place prize is a body bag.

  5. I'm a little surprised how few people realize we – meaning "America with a unified Constitutional Republic based on success and benevolence at the level of the individual" – are at the opening stages of a fight to the death.

    The beginning was some years ago as the opposing factions jockeyed for position; now that those positions have been selected and allocated, the contest has started in earnest, and there will be no tie, timeouts or partial victories and only one winner.

    And to win will require more commitment than may be available, from what I've seen. If your side is Righteous you'll have to prove it with the deliberate and thorough application of force, the other side will not supplicate by other means; they're already convinced they're the More Righteous.

  6. After months of extreme duty during the pandemic putting themselves and their families at considerable risk, American law enforcement is seeing the crowd turn ugly, blaming all for the actions of a rogue few. Sure, room for blame, such criminal cops should have been rooted out and forbidden any position of power over anyone. And few if any honest cops deny that.
    I am sure that what has occurred to just about every cop in America is this simple thought: maybe it's time for me to consider a different job, or more simply: me and my family don't need this shit any more. And we are going to lose a great many good officers while the dregs remain, those marginal officers who have no marketable skills and the ones that really get off on having authority over people. The exact ones the system should have rooted out and sidelined already.

    1. They'll step on the wrong toes and quickly become an example of public accountability. And then there'll be no cops.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *