“Critical race theory” is nothing but raw Marxism in disguise


With the news that Washington now requires and mandates “Critical Race Theory (CRT) training for all school staff, board directors, teachers, and administrators in public schools across the state“, and the Biden administration prioritizing grant applications that implement CRT, it’s a good time to remind ourselves what this Marxist gobbledygook is all about.  Christopher Rufo explains.

Critical race theory is an academic discipline, formulated in the 1990s and built on the intellectual framework of identity-based Marxism. Relegated for many years to universities and obscure academic journals, it has increasingly become the default ideology in our public institutions over the past decade. It has been injected into government agencies, public school systems, teacher training programs and corporate human resources departments in the form of diversity training programs, human resources modules, public policy frameworks and school curricula.

Its supporters deploy a series of euphemisms to describe critical race theory, including “equity,” “social justice,” “diversity and inclusion” and “culturally responsive teaching.”

Critical race theorists, masters of language construction, realize that “neo-Marxism” would be a hard sell. Equity, on the other hand, sounds nonthreatening and is easily confused with the American principle of equality. But the distinction is vast and important. Indeed, critical race theorists explicitly reject equality — the principle proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence, defended in the Civil War and codified into law with the 14th and 15th Amendments, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. To them, equality represents “mere nondiscrimination” and provides “camouflage” for white supremacy, patriarchy and oppression.

In contrast to equality, equity as defined and promoted by critical race theorists is little more than reformulated Marxism. In the name of equity, UCLA law professor and critical race theorist Cheryl Harris has proposed suspending private property rights, seizing land and wealth and redistributing them along racial lines.

Critical race guru Ibram X. Kendi, who directs the Center for Antiracist Research at Boston University, has proposed the creation of a federal Department of Antiracism. This department would be independent of (i.e., unaccountable to) the elected branches of government and would have the power to nullify, veto or abolish any law at any level of government and curtail the speech of political leaders and others deemed insufficiently “antiracist.”

One practical result of the creation of such a department would be the overthrow of capitalism, since, according to Kendi, “in order to truly be antiracist, you also have to truly be anticapitalist.”

In other words, identity is the means; Marxism is the end.

An equity-based form of government would mean the end not only of private property but also of individual rights, equality under the law, federalism and freedom of speech. These would be replaced by race-based redistribution of wealth, group-based rights, active discrimination and omnipotent bureaucratic authority.

Historically, the accusation of “anti-Americanism” has been overused. But in this case, it’s not a matter of interpretation: Critical race theory prescribes a revolutionary program that would overturn the principles of the Declaration and destroy the remaining structure of the Constitution.

There’s more at the link.

Dear readers, if you have children in public school or university, you need to be aware of just how prevalent this poisonous doctrine is becoming;  and you need to organize against it.  It has no place in a free society, because it leads to the permanent, irrevocable loss of the freedoms we take for granted.



  1. Our state just voted to deny funding to universities that promote CRT.

    Our university president wrote a vaguely-worded notice to everybody at the university decrying an unspecified defamation of the university by special interest groups, as a result of this.

  2. @ Third Boxcar,
    I think there is a real danger that the leadership of many mainline denominations, including mine (the United Methodist Church) will drink the CRT Koolaid. Rejecting this without rejecting our brothers and sisters in Christ who have mistaken it for a good thing will take grace, no small amount of discernment, and considerable firmness, forbearance, and tact.

  3. An unaccountable independent group that can nullify any law at any level? Yeah, that isn't too much like totalitarianism. Nazi Germany had a similar situation, where "Der Fuehrer's" will overruled all laws.

  4. Are the people of Washington going to do anything about it? No? Ok. How about the people of the US? Also no? Ok.

    Everyone knows what the problem is. But enough of the population is accepting of it, so the discussion needs to change.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *